Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles
نویسندگان
چکیده
Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles The well-known Easterlin paradox points out that average happiness has remained constant over time despite sharp rises in GNP per head. At the same time, a micro literature has typically found positive correlations between individual income and individual measures of subjective well-being. This paper suggests that these two findings are consistent with the presence of relative income terms in the utility function. Income may be evaluated relative to others (social comparison) or to oneself in the past (habituation). We review the evidence on relative income from the subjective well-being literature. We also discuss the relation (or not) between happiness and utility and discuss some non-happiness research (behavioural, experimental, neurological) dealing with income comparisons. We last consider how relative income in the utility function affects economic models of behaviour in a number of different domains. JEL Classification: D01, D31, H00, I31, J28
منابع مشابه
Tamás Keller the Connection between Life Satisfaction and Material Aspirations
In seeking to answer the question of whether income brings happiness, Richard Easterlin (1974, 1995) found a paradox. Within a given country, higher-income respondents usually reported greater happiness; however – in cross-country comparison – if aggregate income in a country rises, happiness does not necessarily follow. Both theoretical and empirical social research provides a number of explan...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Economic Growth and Subjective Well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox
The "Easterlin paradox" suggests that there is no link between a society's economic development and its average level of happiness. We re-assess this paradox analyzing multiple rich datasets spanning many decades. Using recent data on a broader array of countries, we establish a clear positive link between average levels of subjective well-being and GDP per capita across countries, and find no ...
متن کاملEconomic growth and the human lot.
I n 1974, Richard A. Easterlin, a coauthor of the work by Easterlin et al. (1) in PNAS, published a seminal article (2) that has generated a huge literature. It sought to explain why the happiness score in the United States (and elsewhere) had stayed roughly constant, whereas income per capita had trended up. This evidence has come to be known as the Easterlin Paradox. His explanation was that ...
متن کاملReal World Happiness
Time series data show that nations do not get happier over time as they get richer. In contrast, happiness is positively correlated with individual income within a given country at any point in time; the rich generally report greater happiness than the poor. This, the so-called Easterlin paradox, named after the doyen of happiness studies, Richard Easterlin, is also discussed at length in the h...
متن کاملThe unhappy thing about happiness economics
Time series data show that nations do not get happier over time as they get richer. In contrast, happiness is positively correlated with individual income within a given country at any point in time; the rich generally report greater happiness than the poor. This, the socalled Easterlin paradox, named after the doyen of happiness studies, Richard Easterlin, is also discussed at length in the ha...
متن کامل